Multiscale Modeling of Lung Disease-Influenced Aerosol Dosimetry

Investigators
C Darquenne, RA Corley, AP Kuprat, B Asgharian, O Price
Contact info (email)
cdarquenne@ucsd.edu
1. Define context(s)
aid in clinical trial design
other
Current Conformance Level / Target Conformance Level
Extensive
Primary goal of the model/tool/database

The primary goal of the model is to predict the deposition of inhaled aerosols in the respiratory system of humans and rats including those with chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (COPD) that will improve assessments of risks for potentially susceptible individuals exposed to airborne aerosols of physical, chemical or biological origin as well as therapeutic interventions via respiratory drug delivery.

 

Biological domain of the model
lung
Structure(s) of interest in the model
respiratory tract including upper airway, conducting airways and alveolar region
Spatial scales included in the model
µm to cm
Time scales included in the model
msec to minutes
2. Data for building and validating the model
Data for building the model Published? Private? How is credibility checked? Current Conformance Level / Target Conformance Level
in vitro (primary cells cell, lines, etc.)
ex vivo (excised tissues)
in vivo pre-clinical (lower-level organism or small animal) y y cross-checked with other results extensive
in vivo pre-clinical (large animal)
Human subjects/clinical y y cross-checked with other results adequate
Other: ________________________
Data for validating the model Published? Private? How is credibility checked? Current Conformance Level / Target Conformance Level
in vitro (primary cells cell, lines, etc.)
ex vivo (excised tissues)
in vivo pre-clinical (lower-level organism or small animal) y y cross-checked with other results adequate
in vivo pre-clinical (large animal)
Human subjects/clinical y y cross-checked with other results adequate
Other: ________________________
3. Validate within context(s)
Who does it? When does it happen? How is it done? Current Conformance Level / Target Conformance Level
Verification students/postdocs and investigators Throughout By checking for 1) adequacy of equations used to simulate process, 2) mesh independency, 3) convergence of solution, 4) mass and flow balance, 5) fluid and particle properties extensive
Validation students/postdocs and investigators and third party students/postdocs and investigators Comparison with existing experimental database adequate
Uncertainty quantification students/postdocs and investigators as different components of the models are validated comparison against experimental data adequate
Sensitivity analysis students/postdocs and investigators as different components of the models are validated comparison against experimental data adequate
Other:__________
Additional Comments
4. Limitations
Disclaimer statement (explain key limitations) Who needs to know about this disclaimer? How is this disclaimer shared with that audience? Current Conformance Level / Target Conformance Level
Subject-specificity of anatomical models is limited by resolution of imaging datasets used to develop the models relevant scientific community who intends to use/build/extend the mode through dissemination in papers, abstracts, and public lectures adequate
5. Version control
Current Conformance Level / Target Conformance Level
adequate
Naming Conventions? Repository? Code Review?
individual modeler yes yes peers
within the lab yes yes project team
collaborators yes yes through ZoomMeeting conference calls
6. Documentation
Current Conformance Level / Target Conformance Level
Code commented? partial
Scope and intended use described? partial
User’s guide? partial
Developer’s guide? partial
7. Dissemination
Current Conformance Level / Target Conformance Level
partial
Target Audience(s): “Inner circle” Scientific community Public
Simulations Are shared directly within the project team, across institutions. in progress as model/code are still under development
Models Are shared directly within the project team, across institutions. in progress as model/code are still under development
Software Are shared directly within the project team, across institutions. in progress as model/code are still under development
Results Are shared directly within the project team, across institutions. in progress as model/code are still under development
Implications of results in progress as model/code are still under development
8. Independent reviews
Current Conformance Level / Target Conformance Level
partial
Reviewer(s) name & affiliation: A/prof Mullins and Dr. Mead-Hunter, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
When was review performed? first review planned for Year 3 of project
How was review performed and outcomes of the review? Not yet available
9. Test competing implementations
Current Conformance Level / Target Conformance Level
partial
Yes or No (briefly summarize)
Were competing implementations tested? yes
Did this lead to model refinement or improvement? yes
10. Conform to standards
Current Conformance Level / Target Conformance Level
adequate
Yes or No (briefly summarize)
Are there operating procedures, guidelines, or standards for this type of multiscale modeling? Yes
How do your modeling efforts conform? Good